|
Reports and Studies
| Main
Page | Alternative
Fuels | Alternative Fuel Vehicle
Applications |
| Environmental and Health Studies
| Other Resources
|
Reports and Studies: Alternative
Fuels
Hydrogen - Many Years in the
Future The promise of vehicles operating on hydrogen fuel
cells is many years into the future, according to a report of the
National Academies of Science (NAS). The report discusses the many
technical, social and policy challenges that must be overcome
before the projected promise of a hydrogen economy can be
achieved. Obstacles noted include: fuel cell lifetimes are
currently much too short and fuel cell costs are more than 10
times too high to provide a cost-effective alternative for
consumers; the driving range of fuel cell vehicles, only about
half that of a gasoline vehicle, is much too short; the
production, storage and transmission of hydrogen are costly, use
significant amounts of energy, and, in many cases, result in
emissions of pollutants and CO2. The NAS report goes on to provide
recommendations to overcome these obstacles. The full report
"The Hydrogen Economy: Opportunities, Costs, Barriers, and
R&D Needs" can be viewed and purchased at:
http://www.nas.edu/
Study Shows Additive Reduces NOx
Emissions with Biodiesel The results of a new study indicate a
reduction in nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions from biodiesel is
attainable. Biodiesel is known to reduce emissions of all regulated
pollutants, with exception of NOx emissions. A new additive,
designed by Clean Diesel Technologies (CDT), has shown as much as a
5% reduction in NOx emissions compared to No. 1 diesel fuel. The
biodiesel blend consisted of 80% No. 1 diesel and 20% biodiesel,
along with CDT's patented Platinum Plus fuel-borne catalyst. The
study also showed a reduction of 23 percent particulates. According
to James Valentine, President of CDT, the tested blend performed
better than a commercial ultra-low sulfur diesel fuel (ULSD) in
reducing particulate matter (PM), NOx and carbon monoxide, and was
close to the performance of ULSD in reducing hydrocarbon emissions.
Additional testing will be needed to determine the effectiveness of
the additive when blended with No. 2 diesel. For more information on
the additive and the study, contact the National
Biodiesel Board. Ethanol Use Shown to Reduce
Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2003 According to the Renewable
Fuels Association (RFA) and the Argonne National Laboratory, the use
of ethanol-blended fuels reduced carbon dioxide-equivalent
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by approximately 5.7 million tons in
the United States during 2003. This reduction is equivalent to
removing the annual greenhouse gas emissions of more than 853,000
cars from the road. The reduction is based on the "carbon
cycle" associated with ethanol production, with much of the
greenhouse gas emissions released being absorbed by plants, like
corn, grown for ethanol feedstocks. The benefits of ethanol also
include the reduction in other harmful pollutants, rural economic
development and increased energy security.
NDCF Releases Findings On The Hidden
Cost of Imported Oil The
National Defense Council Foundation (NDCF) has released the findings
of its analysis of the "hidden cost" of imported oil. The
NDCF project represents a comprehensive investigation of the
economic and military penalty our growing dependence on imported oil
exacts from the U.S. economy. Some of the findings include:
* Paying for imported oil results in the loss of 828,400 jobs in the
U.S. economy.
* U.S. dependence on foreign oil results in the loss of almost $160
billion from our GDP annually.
* There are almost $49.1 billion annually in defense outlays to
maintain the capability to defend the flow of Persian Gulf Oil - the
equivalent of adding $1.17 to the price of a gallon of gasoline.
* Total economic penalties to the U.S. economy ranges up to $300
billion per year.
* If reflected at the gasoline pump, all these "hidden
costs" would raise the price of a gallon of gasoline to over
$5.20.
The report also outlines the benefits of shifting the U.S.
transportation sector to non-petroleum fuels. For more information,
contact the NDCF at (703) 836-3443 or
ndcf@erols.com.
Industrial
Truck Emission Data Compared by Fuel is
available from the Propane Education Research Council.
9 pages, in Word format. Discusses key emissions studies from
the 1990s to present.
Case
Study of CNG Buses in Washington DC The Department of Energy's National Renewable Energy Laboratory
has published a fact sheet titled "Evaluating the Emission Reduction Benefits
of WMATA Natural Gas Buses". The fact sheet details emission testing of compressed natural gas (CNG) and diesel transit buses
operated by the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA).
Compared with their conventional diesel counterparts, the CNG buses produced 53% lower oxides of nitrogen, 85% lower total particulate matter,
and 89% lower carbon monoxide emissions.
Heavy-Duty Vehicle
Emissions
The goal of the Department of Energy's heavy vehicle emissions testing is to compare emissions from alternative fuel and advanced technology trucks and buses to their conventional diesel counterparts.
Information provided on this website includes access to numerous
technical reports on emissions analyses.
Study Compares Alternative Fuel
Forklift Emissions The Propane Education and Research Council
(PERC)
recently released a review of forklift emission studies, titled
"Industrial Truck Emission Data Compared by Fuel", that
compares emissions data from propane-powered forklifts to findings
from forklifts powered by compressed natural gas (CNG) and standard
gasoline. The review finds that propane forklifts fitted with
approved closed loop controls and exhaust catalysts result in very
low emissions that meet and exceed California Air Resource Board
Large Spark Ignition standards. Additionally, the review finds that
propane demonstrates the highest energy efficiencies when compared
to other fuel production life cycles. The review examines research
findings from seven forklift emissions studies performed between
1990 and 2002, including two studies that used life cycle analyses
emissions models to assess the emissions impact of upstream
production of a given fuel. Study
Says CNG Provides More Health Benefit Than New Diesel Engines Researchers
at the Harvard Center for Risk Analysis, a division of the Harvard
University's School of Public Health (HSPH), recently released the
results of a new analysis comparing the health benefits of
emission-controlled diesel (ECD) engines to compressed natural gas (CNG)-fueled
engines. According to the study, CNG engines provide a third more
health benefits than the new diesle engines. HSPH notes that the
study measured the 'public health damages' produced by the CNG and
ECD engines in urban transit buses using noits of 'quality adjusted
life years'. Both CNG and ECD reduce emissions of fine particulate
by about 75%, with CNG having a further health advantage because it
also reduces emissions of nitrogen oxide (NOx), a gas that
contributes to ground-level ozone, or smog, and to the formation of
fine particles. Contact: Joshua Coehn, HSPH at (617) 432-0394 or
cohenj@hsph.harvard.edu .
NGVC Publishes Second Clean Bus
Report The Natural Gas Vehicle Coalition this week published the
second quarterly issue of the Clean Bus Report. The newsletter is
geared to elected officials and board members of transit agencies
and is designed to provide transit officials and decision-makers
with accurate information about alternative fuel technology. The
April issue features news on the latest on the legislative front,
updates on recent transit bus purchases and the next step on the
path to hydrogen, among other things. You can access the Clean Bus
Report on the NGVC website or if you would like to receive a copy of the Clean Bus Report
directly, contact Colleen MacMillan at (202) 824-7365 or
cmacmillan@ngvc.org.
Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Resource
Guide Available The
"Resource Guide for Heavy-Duty LNG Vehicles, Infrastructure,
and Support Operations" is now available from the U.S.
Department of Energy's Brookhaven National Laboratory and the Gas
Technology Institute. The guide is designed to assist fleet managers
and other decision makers in evaluating the use of LNG in heavy-duty
vehicles.
Natural Gas Powers UPS A study
by the National Renewable Energy Laboratories (NREL) of delivery
trucks operated by United Parcel Service (UPS) shows that the
natural gas trucks produced 75 percent lower carbon monoxide
emissions and half of the nitrogen oxide emissions of similar diesel
vehicles. The report can be downloaded at http://www.ctts.nrel.gov/heavy_vehicle/pdfs/31227.pdf.
For more information contact Kevin Walkowicz at (303) 275-4492 or kevin_walkowicz@nrel.gov.
Study Confirms Benefits of Natural
Gas Engines Over Diesel A
technical paper published by the Society of Automobile Engineers (SAE)
compares the emissions of heavy-duty trucks powered by C8.3
diesel engines and Cummins Westport C Gas Plus natural gas engines.
The natural gas engines demonstrated reductions in carbon
monoxide (93 percent), oxides of nitrogen (45 percent), particulate
matter (90 percent) and carbon dioxide (CO2) (6.5 percent).
Another advantage of the natural gas trucks is a reduced fuel cost
per mile ($0.11 vs $0.16). Copies of the paper are available from
SAE International at (877) 606-7323 or www.sae.org
by requesting technical paper 2002-01-2737.
Controversy
Over Study of Diesel and Natural Gas School Bus Emissions International
Truck and Engine Company and ConocoPhillips Company recently
sponsored a study by the Southwest Research Institute, comparing an
older model natural gas school bus to a new technology
diesel-powered bus operating on ultra-low sulfur diesel. The study's
sponsors view the study's results as demonstrating lower emissions
from the diesel engines. These conclusions are being challenged,
however, particularly by the Natural Gas Vehicle Coalition (NGVC).
The NGVC notes that the study compares "apples and
oranges". The diesel-powered bus was equipped with advanced
emission controls and operated on ultra-low sulfur fuel that is not
generally available on the market, while the natural gas buses were not
equipped with emission after-treatment. According to the NGVC,
the report demonstrates that the “best” advanced diesel engine
technology still has higher emissions in some cases than both the
natural gas technology and conventional diesel technology on the
road today. However, International took selected results from this
test and used them to tout the benefits of diesel over natural gas.
If International had performed a fair comparison using a natural gas
engine equipped with a simple oxidation catalyst, the results would
have shown the overwhelming environmental advantages of the natural
gas model. The California Air Resources Board recently completed
such a test, comparing natural gas and diesel transit buses. The
NGVC has released a statement decrying International’s
deliberately deceptive tactics. The press release is available on
the NGVC web site at http://www.ngvc.org/ngv/ngvc.nsf/bytitle/release02011.html
or by contacting Colleen MacMillan at (202) 824-73645 or cmacmillan@ngvc.org.
A copy of the International report can be found at http://www.greendieseltechnology.com/swri_report.pdf.
Exhaust Study Measures Emissions of
Biodiesel and Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel Blend West Virginia
University recently conducted a series of exhaust emissions tests on
transit buses operated by the Washington Metropolitan Transit
Authority. The tests compared
exhaust emissions from a transit bus with a 1990 Cummins L10
engine operating on standard diesel, ultra low sulfur diesel (ULSD)
and a blend of 20% biodiesel with 80% ULSD (B20). The tests
involving the use of ULSD and the B20 blend also involved the use of
an Engelhard DPX catalyzed particulate filter.
View
results (Adobe Acrobat file)
EPA Releases Draft Technical
Report on Biodiesel Emissions The Environmental Protection
Agency has released a draft report entitled, "A Comprehensive
Analysis of Biodiesel Impacts on Exhaust Emissions." The draft
report is the result of the EPA's biodiesel emissions analysis
program. The report examines existing data in an effort to quantify
the air pollution emission effects of biodiesel. EPA's analysis
includes biodiesel's effect on fuel economy, but does not
investigate other aspects of biodiesel use, such as engine
durability or cost. The draft technical report is available at: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/models/biodsl.htm
USDA Releases Report on Ethanol
Energy Balance The U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) recently released a new report, "The Energy
Balance of Corn Ethanol: An Update," which found that ethanol
yields 34 percent more energy than is consumed by growing and
harvesting the corn and distilling it into ethanol. According
to the report, the energy balance of corn-based ethanol has become
positive in recent years due to several factors, including advances
in ethanol conversion technology and increased efficiency in farm
production. Contact: Alisa Harrison, USDA, phone 202-720-4623; Monte
Shaw, Renewable Fuels Association, phone 202-289-3835.
|